CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
VS
NVIDIA Tesla M2050
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla M2050
1.03 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16
+1148%
12.86 TFLOPS
Tesla M2050
VS
GRID RTX T10 16
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Unknown
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
773 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
4608
56
TMUs
288
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
32.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
1030 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
515.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Board Design
225W
TDP
260W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla K10 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
2
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
3
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
4
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
5
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
6
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
7
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
8
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
9
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
10
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
Related News
1
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
2
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
3
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
4
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
5
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
6
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
7
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
8
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
9
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
10
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy