Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2050 +215%
1.03 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2014
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
773 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
192
56
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
32.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1030 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
515.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
35W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy