Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2050 +20%
1.03 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2014
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
773 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
640
56
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
32.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1030 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
515.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy