Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2050
1.03 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000 +73%
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Apr 2016
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
796 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
773 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
32.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1030 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
515.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy