Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2070 Q and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
5696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2070 Q
1.028 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900 +5864%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Apr 2023
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
96
448
Shading Units
6144
56
TMUs
384
48
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
96
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
Navi 31
GF100-876-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Fermi
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
295W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy