CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA RTX A4 Mobile
NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA RTX A4 Mobile
VS
NVIDIA Tesla M2075
NVIDIA RTX A4 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 4GB VRAM RTX A4 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
NVIDIA RTX A4 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
RTX A4 Mobile
+605%
7.25 TFLOPS
Tesla M2075
VS
RTX A4 Mobile
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Apr 2021
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1297 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
2048
56
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
113.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.250 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.250 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
113.3 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GA107
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Board Design
225W
TDP
Unknown
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075
2
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075
3
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075
4
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075
5
AMD Radeon Instinct MI60 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075
6
NVIDIA Quadro 7000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075
7
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075
8
NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
9
NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000
10
NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy