CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA Tesla M2090
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (122W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
+62%
2.169 TFLOPS
Tesla M2090
VS
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2012
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
122W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q
2
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
3
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
4
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
5
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA RTX A5000
6
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla M4
7
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
8
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
9
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
10
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla D870
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy