Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
13568 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +3493%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Nov 2021
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
14080
64
TMUs
880
48
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
500W
600 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy