Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1519MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro P1000 Mobile +16%
1.555 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2017
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Pascal-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1493 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1519 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
4
512
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.30 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.61 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.30 GFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.555 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.61 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
40W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
N18P-Q1-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy