NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1543MHz
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Mobile
+315%
5.53 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1328 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1543 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
14
512
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.75 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
86.41 GFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.530 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
172.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
