Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 DGXS and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla P100 DGXS +1347%
10.61 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Mar 2013
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
715 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
384
224
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

142.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
331.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
21.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.61 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
5.304 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
51W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP100
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.0
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy