Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Mar 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-III

Clock Speeds

1260 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
-
320
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
16
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

176.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.80 GTexel/s
28.26 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
G71
-
GPU Variant
-
Volta
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.278 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
45W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy