Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P520 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1493MHz vs 1380MHz)
Lower TDP (18W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG500 216 +1131%
14.13 TFLOPS
Quadro P520 Mobile
1.147 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1260 MHz
Base Clock
1303 MHz
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
3
5120
Shading Units
384
320
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
16
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

176.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.89 GPixel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.83 GTexel/s
28.26 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
17.92 GFLOPS
14.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1147 GFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.83 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
18W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GP108
-
-
-
Volta
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy