Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1785MHz vs 1380MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG500 216 +286%
14.13 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1260 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
1024
320
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
32
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

176.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
28.26 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
14.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
-
Volta
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
60W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy