Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
4672 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (238W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG500 216 +1274%
14.13 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Jul 2011
Tesla
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1260 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
14
5120
Shading Units
448
320
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
48
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

176.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
28.26 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
238W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Volta
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy