Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA GRID K340

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA GRID K340

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 1024MB VRAM GRID K340 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K340 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216 +2037%
15.67 TFLOPS
GRID K340
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Jul 2013
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1312 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
384
320
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Volta
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.0
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy