Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 98% (1530MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216 +561%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Jul 2013
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1312 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
1536
320
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
32
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Volta
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.0
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy