Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
5072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216 +14409%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Apr 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1312 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
48
320
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Volta
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy