CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
VS
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
NVIDIA Quadro 400
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
5072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216
+14409%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216
VS
Quadro 400
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Apr 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1312 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s
Render Config
80
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
48
320
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GV100
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Volta
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
2
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
3
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
4
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
5
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
6
NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
7
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
8
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
9
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro P500 Mobile
10
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy