Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
5056 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216 +9693%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Feb 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1312 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
8
5120
Shading Units
64
320
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
70W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Volta
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy