Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 36% (1530MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216 +1715%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Mar 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1312 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
384
320
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Volta
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
Unknown
815 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

250W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy