Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 36% (1530MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216 +988%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Jul 2014
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1312 MHz
Base Clock
1046 MHz
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
640
320
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
16
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
68W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Volta
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy