Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 1133GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216 +6%
15.67 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Jan 2022
Tesla
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1312 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
8192
320
TMUs
256
128
ROPs
128
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
500W
600 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Volta
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
8 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy