Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216 +628%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Aug 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1312 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
1024
320
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
32
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Volta
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy