CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20s
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20s
VS
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
NVIDIA Tesla K20s
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20s to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K20s 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216
+445%
15.67 TFLOPS
Tesla K20s
2.87 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216
VS
Tesla K20s
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Feb 2013
Tesla
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1312 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
5GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
320bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
80
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
2496
320
TMUs
208
128
ROPs
40
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
Theoretical Performance
195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.90 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
119.6 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.870 TFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
956.8 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GV100
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
-
Volta
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.0
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
2
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
3
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
4
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
5
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
6
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
7
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro P500 Mobile
8
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB
9
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200
10
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
Related News
1
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
2
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
3
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
4
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
5
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
6
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
7
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
8
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
9
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
10
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy