CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050
VS
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
NVIDIA Tesla S2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
4672 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 900W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216
+1424%
15.67 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216
VS
Tesla S2050
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Jul 2011
Tesla
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1312 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
80
SM Count
14
5120
Shading Units
448
320
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
48
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
900W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GV100
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Volta
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI
2
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile
3
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M
4
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
5
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
6
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020
7
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
8
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
9
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
10
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy