Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla S2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 900W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S2050 +851%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Apr 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
773 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
6
448
Shading Units
48
56
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

900W
TDP
32W
1300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy