Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 FHHL and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1290MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
5072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla V100 FHHL +11287%
13.21 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2018
Release Date
Jan 2010
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1290 MHz
Boost Clock
-
810 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
829.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
6
5120
Shading Units
48
320
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

165.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
412.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
26.42 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.21 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
6.605 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Volta
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy