CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
VS
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 140M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1597MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
5104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
+62784%
16.35 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 140M
0.026 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
VS
Quadro NVS 140M
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
May 2007
Tesla
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1245 MHz
Base Clock
-
1597 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
80
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
16
320
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
204.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
511.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
32.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
8.177 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GV100
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
G86-740-A2
Volta
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
10W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
2
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI100
3
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
4
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
5
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
6
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
7
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q
8
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile
9
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
10
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C870
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy