CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
VS
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (897.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB
+2037%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB
VS
Quadro K2000D
Graphics Card
Mar 2018
Release Date
Mar 2013
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1290 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
876 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
897.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
80
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
384
320
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GV100
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Volta
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
51W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.0
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs H200 SXM
2
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla K40d
3
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe
4
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA L4
5
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB
6
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
7
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q
8
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla P6
9
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
10
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro 600
Related News
1
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
2
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
3
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
4
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
5
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
6
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
7
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
8
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
9
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
10
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy