Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla X2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Tesla X2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla X2070 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla X2070 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla X2070 +54%
1.166 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
576
56
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

18.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
36.46 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1166 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
582.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GK104
GF100-876-A3
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy