Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 and 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 134.8GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla X2090 +7%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000
1.244 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2013
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1404 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
134.8GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.96 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
80W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy