NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (2520MHz vs 2000MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
17664 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+2924%
92.9 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 40
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
768
576
TMUs
48
192
ROPs
24
576
Tensor Cores
96
144
RT Cores
6
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
25W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
DG2-128
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
