NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
18392 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+290212%
92.9 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
40
576
TMUs
4
192
ROPs
4
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
800W
TDP
32W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
RV620
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
