NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (2520MHz vs 1785MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
17024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (125W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+1748%
92.9 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX
5.027 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2021
GeForce 40
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
22
18432
Shading Units
1408
576
TMUs
88
192
ROPs
48
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
125W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
TU116
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
