NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
18416 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+265328%
92.9 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2009
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
2
18432
Shading Units
16
576
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
800W
TDP
31W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GT216
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
