NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
18432 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 800W)
Score
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
-
576
TMUs
4
192
ROPs
4
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
800W
TDP
32W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
RV516
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
3.0
