Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM

NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
18368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada +44563%
92.9 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 140 OEM
0.208 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2009
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
144
SM Count
8
18432
Shading Units
64
576
TMUs
32
192
ROPs
16
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.80 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
208.0 GFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

800W
TDP
105W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
G94B
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net