NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs AMD FirePro S9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
15616 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (275W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+1673%
92.9 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170
5.238 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2015
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
44
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
2816
576
TMUs
176
192
ROPs
64
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
275W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Hawaii
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.3
