NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
18384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+59451%
92.9 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230
0.156 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2009
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
6
18432
Shading Units
48
576
TMUs
24
192
ROPs
16
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
800W
TDP
75W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
G94B
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
