NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 81.60GB/s)
18144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+12303%
92.9 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 SE v2
0.749 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2010
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
81.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
6
18432
Shading Units
288
576
TMUs
48
192
ROPs
24
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.800 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.20 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
748.8 GFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
62.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
150W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GF114
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
