NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
18336 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+36047%
92.9 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2009
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
54.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
12
18432
Shading Units
96
576
TMUs
32
192
ROPs
8
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
800W
TDP
69W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GT215
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
