NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 73% (2520MHz vs 1455MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
17792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+4889%
92.9 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1050
1.862 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2016
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
1354 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
5
18432
Shading Units
640
576
TMUs
40
192
ROPs
32
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.56 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.20 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.10 GFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.862 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
58.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
75W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GP107
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
GP107-300-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
