NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
17408 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+4436%
92.9 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2022
GeForce 40
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
1024
576
TMUs
64
192
ROPs
64
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
35W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
609 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
