NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
17792 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+5503%
92.9 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2019
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
640
576
TMUs
32
192
ROPs
16
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
65W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Polaris 23
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
