NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs AMD Radeon R7 240
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 223% (2520MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
18112 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+18517%
92.9 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 40
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
320
576
TMUs
20
192
ROPs
8
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
800W
TDP
30W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Oland
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
Oland PRO
(215-0837015)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
