NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 20GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 800.0GB/s)
13056 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (3000MHz vs 2520MHz)
Lower TDP (300W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+44%
92.9 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XT
64.51 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 40
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
84
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
5376
576
TMUs
336
192
ROPs
192
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
84
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
96 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
300W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a
2x DisplayPort 2.1
1x USB Type-C
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Navi 31
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
