NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (2520MHz vs 2175MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 20GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 360.0GB/s)
12288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+247%
92.9 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
26.73 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 40
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
160bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
48
18432
Shading Units
6144
576
TMUs
192
192
ROPs
64
576
Tensor Cores
192
144
RT Cores
48
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
130W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
AD104
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
