NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
14336 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+772%
92.9 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 40
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
4096
576
TMUs
256
192
ROPs
256
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
150W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
609 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
