NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

VS

NVIDIA TITAN RTX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM TITAN RTX and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3060 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN RTX 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1770MHz vs 1665MHz)

More VRAM (24GB vs 8GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 's Advantages

Released 2 years late

256 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (200W vs 280W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

TITAN RTX

16.31 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16.2 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

TITAN RTX +29%

15148

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

11663

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

TITAN RTX +38%

68

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

49

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

TITAN RTX +33%

124

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

93

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

TITAN RTX +33%

172

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

129

GTA 5 2160p

TITAN RTX +109%

130

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

62

GTA 5 1440p

TITAN RTX +31%

130

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

99

GTA 5 1080p

TITAN RTX +20%

180

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

149

TITAN RTX

VS

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Graphics Card

Dec 2018

Release Date

Dec 2020

GeForce 20

Generation

GeForce 30

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz

Base Clock

1410 MHz

1770 MHz

Boost Clock

1665 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

24GB

Memory Size

8GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

384bit

Memory Bus

256bit

672.0GB/s

Bandwidth

448.0GB/s

Render Config

72

SM Count

38

-

Compute Units

-

4608

Shading Units

4864

288

TMUs

152

96

ROPs

80

576

Tensor Cores

152

72

RT Cores

38

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

6 MB

L2 Cache

4 MB

Theoretical Performance

169.9 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

133.2 GPixel/s

509.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

253.1 GTexel/s

32.62 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

16.20 TFLOPS

16.31 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

16.20 TFLOPS

509.8 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

253.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102

GPU Name

GA104

TU102-400-A1

GPU Variant

GA104-200-A1

Turing

Architecture

Ampere

TSMC

Foundry

Samsung

12 nm

Process Size

8 nm

18.6 billion

Transistors

17.4 billion

754 mm²

Die Size

392 mm²

Board Design

280W

TDP

200W

600 W

Suggested PSU

550 W

1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 12-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

8.6

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

2

ATI FireGL V7700 vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

3

AMD Radeon RX 7800 vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

4

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

5

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

6

AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

7

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

8

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA P102 101

9

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

10

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs AMD Radeon R7 250E

Related News

1

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

2

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

3

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

4

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

5

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

6

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

7

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

8

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

9

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

10

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip