NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD FirePro W4100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+1600%
10.97 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
TITAN X Pascal
+1972%
9844
FirePro W4100
475
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 10
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
512
224
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
